From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jon Nelson" <jnelson+pgsql(at)jamponi(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump |
Date: | 2010-11-04 16:14:45 |
Message-ID: | 9974.1288887285@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-performance |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Trying to understand real world cases that this would
>> break...would the following now fail w/o explicit cast?
>>
>> create type x as (a int, b int);
>> select f((1,2));
> It already does:
I think Merlin probably meant to write "select x((1,2))", but that
doesn't work out-of-the-box either. What would be affected is
something like
select text((1,2));
which you'd now be forced to write as
select (1,2)::text;
(or you could use CAST notation; but not text(row) or row.text).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-11-04 16:48:08 | Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-11-04 15:35:08 | Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-11-04 16:48:08 | Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-11-04 15:35:08 | Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump |