| From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: speed up unicode decomposition and recomposition |
| Date: | 2020-10-23 23:18:13 |
| Message-ID: | 996E0672-5638-4231-9834-79C519A21200@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 9:07 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I chanced to do an --enable-coverage test run today, and I got this
> weird message during "make coverage-html":
>
> genhtml: WARNING: function data mismatch at /home/postgres/pgsql/src/common/unicode_norm.c:102
>
> I've never seen anything like that before. I suppose it means that
> something about 783f0cc64 is a bit fishy, but I don't know what.
>
> The emitted coverage report looks fairly normal anyway. It says
> unicode_norm.c has zero test coverage, which is very possibly correct
> since I wasn't running in UTF8 encoding, but I'm not entirely sure of
> that either.
>
> This is with RHEL8's lcov-1.13-4.el8 package. I suppose the first
> question is does anybody else see that?
I don't see it on mac nor on ubuntu64. I get 70.6% coverage of lines and 90.9% of functions on ubuntu.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2020-10-23 23:22:22 | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-23 23:12:41 | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |