| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rui Zhao <zhaorui126(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Tatsuya Kawata <kawatatatsuya0913(at)gmail(dot)com>, fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jobin Augustine <jobinau(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Improving display of octal GUCs |
| Date: | 2026-09-06 15:48:12 |
| Message-ID: | 99582.1788709692@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Rui Zhao <zhaorui126(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> What do you think of Rui's suggestion for a HINT if we're throwing
>> out-of-range for an octal GUC? I think it's a little more complicated
>> than he paints it, because the syntax rules are different in
>> postgresql.conf than in SQL, but we could make it happen if we thought
>> it was worth the trouble.
> Having looked at what the hint would actually have to say, I'd drop it.
Yeah, I suspected it'd be too complicated to be useful. Sounds like
we're all on the same page, so I'll get this pushed soon.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2026-09-06 16:18:18 | RE: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) can crash a logical decoding session |
| Previous Message | Rui Zhao | 2026-09-06 15:04:12 | Re: Improving display of octal GUCs |