| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever |
| Date: | 2004-03-17 01:55:20 |
| Message-ID: | 9950.1079488520@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> If I remember correctly, you didn't like the index routines reading the
> tuple information, or something like that, but there was a performance
> benefit for duplicate keys, so I think we should re-investigate this.
I don't see the actual patch either in the hackers or patches archives,
nor on your to-apply pages, making it a bit difficult to re-investigate.
Where was it posted anyway?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-17 01:56:16 | Re: Doxygen? |
| Previous Message | Jonathan Gardner | 2004-03-17 01:40:54 | Doxygen? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-17 02:18:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-17 01:37:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever |