Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com
Subject: Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans
Date: 2020-07-30 22:30:43
Message-ID: 99228D91-75A4-4F45-927C-E4153A817AFD@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 1 Jul 2020, at 15:38, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Another thing I could do is decouple the patches to discuss here from
> the patches of the other thread, which should be possible and might be
> good to avoid back and forth between the two threads.

It sounds like it would make it easier for reviewers, so if it's possible with
a reasonable effort it might be worth it. I've moved this entry to the next CF
for now.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-30 22:38:10 Re: pg_dump --where option
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-30 22:26:36 Re: Online verification of checksums