| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | cm(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unportable implementation of background worker start |
| Date: | 2017-04-24 22:20:44 |
| Message-ID: | 9919.1493072444@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2017-04-24 18:14:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A bit of googling establishes that NetBSD 5.1 has a broken pselect
>> implementation:
>>
>> http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=43625
> Yikes. Do I understand correctly that they effectively just mapped
> pselect to select?
That's what it sounds like. Probably not intentionally, but in effect.
>> What I'm inclined to do is to revert the pselect change but not the other,
>> to see if that fixes these two animals. If it does, we could look into
>> blacklisting these particular platforms when choosing pselect.
> Seems sensible.
Will do.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2017-04-24 22:41:25 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-24 22:19:01 | Re: Unportable implementation of background worker start |