| From: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shawn Debnath <sdn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration |
| Date: | 2022-01-20 16:21:24 |
| Message-ID: | 990B810E-8944-4749-A820-4F46A8CB8502@yandex-team.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> 20 янв. 2022 г., в 20:44, Shawn Debnath <sdn(at)amazon(dot)com> написал(а):
>
> If my test workload can be made better, please let me know. Happy to
> re-run tests as needed.
Shawn, thanks for the benchmarking!
Can you please also test 2nd patch against a large multixact SLRUs?
2nd patch is not intended to do make thing better on default buffer sizes. It must save the perfromance in case of really huge SLRU buffers.
Thanks!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-01-20 16:45:07 | Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-01-20 16:18:51 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |