Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY?
Date: 2017-03-30 03:54:22
Message-ID: 9902.1490846062@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> we have a good number of '(GISTENTRY *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(n)' in our
> code - looks a bit better & shorter to have PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY(n).

Should be PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY_P to match existing conventions,
otherwise +1

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vitaly Burovoy 2017-03-30 04:09:46 Re: sequence data type
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-03-30 03:34:01 Re: Logical decoding on standby