Re: "that" missing in "12.2. Transaction Isolation"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hashem Masoud <u_z_9(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "that" missing in "12.2. Transaction Isolation"
Date: 2005-02-01 04:48:08
Message-ID: 9900.1107233288@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Hashem Masoud <u_z_9(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> I don't know if this is the right place for this, but
> the documentation of Postgresql 8.1Devel has a
> statement
> in the section "12.2. Transaction Isolation" that is
> lacking "that":

> Since the cost of redoing complex transactions may be
> significant, this mode is recommended only when
> updating transactions contain logic sufficiently
> complex that they may give wrong answers in Read
> Committed mode.

I'm confused --- that seems like perfectly OK English grammar to me.
What change are you suggesting exactly?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-02-01 05:46:12 FAQ 4.11.* numbering is off
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2005-02-01 01:29:39 Re: Instructions for FreeBSD ipc config showing age