Re: Fix exclude generated columns in COPY TO with RLS

From: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
To: Ayoub Kazar <ayoub(dot)kazar(at)data-bene(dot)io>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix exclude generated columns in COPY TO with RLS
Date: 2026-11-05 11:34:26
Message-ID: 98e35125-71fe-47c5-bba9-2336ea246124@uni-muenster.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Ayoub

On 04/11/2026 13:58, Ayoub Kazar wrote:
>
> The attached patch uses the existing attnums to build targetlist based
> on it, in the case of RLS.

I tested the patch and it solves the reported issue. It also changes how
COPY TO handles columns that the user has no select privileges on,but
I'd argue this is an improvement:

create user u login;
create table t(a int, b int generated always as (a+40) stored, c text);
insert into t (a,c) values (2,'foo');
grant select (a,c) on t to u;
alter table t enable row level security;
create policy p on t using (true);

== master ==

postgres=# set role u;
SET
postgres=> copy t to stdout;
ERROR: permission denied for table t

== patched ==

postgres=# set role u;
SET
postgres=> copy t to stdout;
2 foo
postgres=>

I guess this test could also be added to the regression tests.

BTW, is there another reason to not allow generated columns in COPY TO
other than being consistent with COPY FROM?

Thanks!

Best, Jim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jakub Wartak 2026-11-05 11:45:07 Re: enhancing pg_basebackup speeds up to ~23Gbps (small fixes + io_uring/Direct I/O)
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2026-11-05 11:21:59 Re: Incorrect CONTEXT reported for errors from parallel apply worker in logical replication