| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Update minimum SSL version |
| Date: | 2019-12-04 22:58:22 |
| Message-ID: | 98c51f43-e746-714a-940c-271773f77d4c@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-12-02 16:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 2019-11-30 04:06, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I think the real question we have to answer is this: are we intent on
>>> making people upgrade ancient openssl installations?
>
>> The trade-off is that this makes the defaults better for the vast
>> majority of users and gives users of really old systems a nudge that
>> they are no longer in compliance with industry best practices. You need
>> manual steps to set up SSL anyway, so this doesn't introduce an entirely
>> new kind of requirement for the latter group of users.
>
> True. I'm okay with this as long as we adapt the ssl test suite as
> per your other reply.
I have committed this with that change. The discussion on which OpenSSL
versions to support and how will continue.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-12-04 23:16:14 | Re: about allow_system_table_mods and SET STATISTICS |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-12-04 22:56:34 | about allow_system_table_mods and SET STATISTICS |