Re: pg_dump --with-* options

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Date: 2025-06-16 22:57:16
Message-ID: 98be6ad839968cc9551161d14bc2d6ba4eadb2b9.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2025-06-16 at 16:09 -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> So perhaps there's not as strong of a
> consensus as we thought.  Maybe we should ask for any new/updated
> votes.

Does it make any sense to be off by default in 18 and on in some later
release?

Regards
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-06-16 23:09:17 Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-06-16 22:50:55 Re: Make tuple deformation faster