Re: get rid of Pointer type, mostly

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: get rid of Pointer type, mostly
Date: 2025-11-24 19:38:25
Message-ID: 987824.1764013105@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 1:26 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I don't understand leaving it in place for GIN.

> I haven't tried removing it for GIN so I don't know how awkward that
> would be or for what reasons, but...

Well, either Peter just ran out of energy or there is actually some
notational value in Pointer. If it's the latter, I'd like to know.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-11-24 19:52:09 Re: get rid of Pointer type, mostly
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-11-24 19:32:24 Re: get rid of Pointer type, mostly