Re: [GENERAL] Corrupt database? 8.1/FreeBSD6.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Corrupt database? 8.1/FreeBSD6.0
Date: 2007-01-12 20:45:42
Message-ID: 9875.1168634742@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Ok, it does what it's intended to do. But in testing it I also
> confirmed that a database-wide vacuum creates a pgstat entry for it and
> for all tables in it. Is this something we want to prevent?

That's odd, because I didn't see any such thing when I tested in CVS tip
the other day. Or did you have stats_block_level turned on?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-01-12 20:54:30 Re: [GENERAL] Corrupt database? 8.1/FreeBSD6.0
Previous Message Brandon Aiken 2007-01-12 20:39:34 Re: FK Constraint on index not PK

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-12 20:53:35 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch to log usage of
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-01-12 20:13:44 Re: [GENERAL] Corrupt database? 8.1/FreeBSD6.0

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-12 20:53:35 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch to log usage of
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-01-12 20:13:44 Re: [GENERAL] Corrupt database? 8.1/FreeBSD6.0