From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "R, Rajesh (STSD)" <rajesh(dot)r2(at)hp(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. |
Date: | 2006-01-16 17:57:46 |
Message-ID: | 9872.1137434266@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"R, Rajesh (STSD)" <rajesh(dot)r2(at)hp(dot)com> writes:
> Just thought that the following patch might improve checking for
> getaddrinfo function (in configure.in)
Since AC_TRY_RUN tests cannot work in cross-compilation scenarios,
you need an *extremely* good reason to put one in. "I thought this
might improve things" doesn't qualify. Exactly what problem are you
trying to solve and why is a run-time test necessary? Why doesn't
the existing coding work for you?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marcin | 2006-01-16 18:09:09 | Huge number of disk writes after migration to 8.1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-16 17:41:46 | Re: Rule system and unsucessful updates. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-16 18:03:20 | Re: Docs off on ILIKE indexing? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-16 17:36:19 | Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) |