| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ODBC functions in gram.y |
| Date: | 2001-12-07 17:46:30 |
| Message-ID: | 986.1007747190@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
>> But more importantly,
>> at this point in the 7.2 cycle we ought not be making any changes that
>> are not *essential* bug fixes. If you want to reorganize the support
>> for CURRENT_TIMESTAMP() like that, let's leave it for 7.3.
> *grumble* The support for this is already organized. I'm just suggesting
> that we avoid arbitrarily damaging our design and implementation with an
> arbitrary reorganization done in the 7.2 development cycle, and that we
> fix it before it become embedded in a release.
I hear you ... but I think the time to have complained was when Peter
put it in, which was nigh two months ago.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-12-07 18:01:56 | Re: ODBC functions in gram.y |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-12-07 17:41:13 | Re: ODBC functions in gram.y |