Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl>, Nathan Myers <ncm(at)zembu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)
Date: 2001-07-10 21:24:36
Message-ID: 9858.994800276@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Could we test SOMAXCONN and set PG_SOMAXCONN to 1000 only if SOMAXCONN1
> is less than 1000?

Why bother?

If you've got some plausible scenario where 1000 is too small, we could
just as easily make it 10000. I don't see the need for yet another
configure test for this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-10 21:25:58 Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)
Previous Message Mike Cianflone 2001-07-10 21:22:34 way to pass NEW into function