Re: partition -> partitioned

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partition -> partitioned
Date: 2018-05-17 02:48:39
Message-ID: 9857e89b-aca5-894d-2a53-5f0c97243432@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/05/17 11:40, David Rowley wrote:
> On 17 May 2018 at 13:52, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Commit 499be013de6 used 'partition' where it really meant 'partitioned' in
>> a few places including in a variable name. For example, what almost all
>> places call 'partitioned_rels', make_partition_pruneinfo called
>> 'partition_rels'.
>>
>> Attached a patch to make that uniform to avoid confusion.
>
> Looks good to me.

Thanks for taking a look at it.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-05-17 03:30:16 Re: Oddity in COPY FROM handling of check constraints on partition tables
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-05-17 02:40:04 Re: partition -> partitioned