Re: machine-readable explain output v4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output v4
Date: 2009-08-05 14:17:13
Message-ID: 9854.1249481833@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> (2) Is it worth making this work?

No, I don't think so. The odds of such a test ever showing anything
interesting seem minimal.

plpgsql's inability to cope with the case would be nice to fix, but
I'm not holding my breath for it...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2009-08-05 14:22:53 Re: ECPG support for struct in INTO list
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-08-05 14:11:20 Re: Adding error message "source"