Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]
Date: 2012-11-07 22:55:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:04:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Should we be doing something
>> about such cases, or is playing dumb correct?

> The SQL standard handles deciding the behavior based on whether WITH
> CHECK OPTION is included in the view DDL.  See the section 2 of the
> SQL standard (Foundation) for details.

Ah, I see it.  So as long as we don't support WITH CHECK OPTION, we
can ignore the issue.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2012-11-07 23:54:15
Subject: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2012-11-07 22:46:41
Subject: Re: RFC: New log_destination 'fifo'

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group