| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The type of ssl_renegotiation_limit |
| Date: | 2010-03-17 18:04:12 |
| Message-ID: | 9837222c1003171104w1e751c83i3ae3904495c87dc8@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:28, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/runtime-config-connection.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-CONNECTION-SECURITY
>
>> ssl_renegotiation_limit (int)
>
> It's described that the type of ssl_renegotiation_limit is "int".
> Though it's not apparent error, we should use "integer" rather than
> "int". In the description of other parameters, "integer" has been
> used. Here is the patch.
You are right, of course. Applied, thanks!
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-03-18 14:27:59 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL |
| Previous Message | Roderick A. Anderson | 2010-03-17 15:38:06 | Re: Incorrect SQL on CREATE INDEX page |