Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Chris Campbell <chris_campbell(at)mac(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL
Date: 2010-02-22 17:45:48
Message-ID: 9837222c1002220945t13c03fa9ra117de040f3fdeca@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/2/22 Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:00:33 +0100, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> wrote:
>
>> We also have to consider our Windows users, where *we* ship the
>> OpenSSL library. Where there is no library we can ship right now that
>> fixes it.
>
> We do? I mean I know that we provide the old 8.2/8.3 pginstaller, but EDB
> is the provider of w32 binaries, not the community.

How does that change the fact even a tiny bit for the end user?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-22 18:01:26 Re: What does this configure warning mean?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-02-22 17:35:29 Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL