| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert James <srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres standard versus Postgres Plus Advanced Server |
| Date: | 2010-02-12 08:09:33 |
| Message-ID: | 9837222c1002120009o15e61952ta35b9530df5c1a33@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Friday, February 12, 2010, Robert James <srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi. I'm setting up a new workstation (Win7 64bit Quad Core 4GB) with
> Postgres, for development work, and trying to pick which version I
> should install. Most of the time, Postgres is dormant - I'm not using
> it all - but when I do use it, the load can be high, and I want
> maximum performance.
>
> Is there any reason to use standard Postgres over Postgres Plus
> Advanced Server?
postgres plus advanced server is a proprietary database. You will have
to pay a licence fee for it. Standard postgres is open source, and a
such free of costs.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yan Cheng Cheok | 2010-02-12 08:17:05 | Make sure there is no two column with same value - What is the best practice? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-12 05:08:35 | Re: "like any" in reverse? |