| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: win32 socket definition |
| Date: | 2010-01-09 21:48:22 |
| Message-ID: | 9837222c1001091348l1b086f4h826dd08a300d515b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 22:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Is there a good trick to find out if you've touched every place you
>> need to, because I'm very unsure I have. I don't even get a warning in
>> more than those two places, but there ought to be some way to trick
>> the system to tell me?
>
> Can't think of one, but you could try grepping for the socket-related
> syscalls to see what variables are referenced there.
Found two more by going over it again that way.
Unless there are objections, I will apply this version tomorrow.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| socket.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2010-01-09 21:53:24 | Re: Setting oom_adj on linux? |
| Previous Message | Tim Bunce | 2010-01-09 21:40:22 | Re: Feature patch 1 for plperl [PATCH] |