| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |
| Date: | 2009-08-10 14:33:17 |
| Message-ID: | 9837222c0908100733q6d0fb42ne27f5c7d80be4ce2@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> It's been a couple of weeks now, and I've had a number of reports both
>> on-list, on-blog and in private, from people using this. I have not
>> yet had a single report of a problem caused by this patch (not
>> counting the case where there was a version mismatch - can't fault the
>> patch for that).
>
>> Given that, I say we apply this for 8.3 and 8.4 now. Comments?
>
> 8.2 as well, no?
8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv
shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I
haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a
separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-08-10 14:45:14 | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-08-10 14:27:21 | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |