Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Date: 2009-07-23 07:04:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 08:04, Tsutomu Yamada<tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hello,
> Thank you for correcting patch.
> However, I think the following block have to use VirualFree*Ex*().
> (yes, this should never happen, maybe there is actually no problem.
>  but for logical correctness)

That is definitely correct. I have updated the patch in my tree and
will make sure to include that in the eventual commit.

FYI, and others, I have received a couple of off-list reports from
people testing out the patch, and so far only positive results.

 Magnus Hagander

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2009-07-23 07:41:56
Subject: Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)
Previous:From: Nikhil SontakkeDate: 2009-07-23 06:55:39
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group