| From: | dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould) |
|---|---|
| To: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker) |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
| Date: | 1998-05-31 18:36:27 |
| Message-ID: | 9805311836.AA27238@hawk.illustra.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sun, 31 May 1998, David Gould wrote:
>
> > Thanks. One question, is there any reason we can't use the intx tests on
> > all the platforms? I realize that float it another set of problems, but it
> > seems that int should be be the same?
>
> 10c10
> < ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Result too large
> ---
> > ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Math result not representable
>
> The changes are more error message relatd then anything...
>
> Marc G. Fournier
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
Thats what I thought. So can we just rename the int*-*BSD.out to int*.out?
-dg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-05-31 18:42:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-05-31 17:40:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |