| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jose Luis Tallon <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20? |
| Date: | 2020-02-09 18:54:19 |
| Message-ID: | 97c8f7b5-4b50-22ad-9e8e-a10c6d33ce59@postgresfriends.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/02/2020 19:28, Jose Luis Tallon wrote:
> * Simplified supportability assessment: PostgreSQL 20, released in
> 2020, would be supported until the release of PostgreSQL 25 (late 2025
> if release cadence is kept as today). Simple and straightforward.
How would you handle multiple releases in the same calendar year (such
as 9.5 and 9.6 were)?
> * We avoid users skipping the release altogether due to superstition or
> analogous reasons ---might be a major issue in some cultures---.
> Postgres 13 would be certainly skipped in production in some
> environments that I know about o_0
That's not our problem.
--
Vik Fearing
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-02-09 19:25:35 | Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20? |
| Previous Message | Jose Luis Tallon | 2020-02-09 18:28:49 | Just for fun: Postgres 20? |