Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: fn ln <emuser20140816(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions
Date: 2019-09-08 20:27:49
Message-ID: 9769c6ab-d628-0eb9-794e-a99080d0d890@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 2019-09-07 18:32, fn ln wrote:
>> Missed them somehow. But I don't think they're quite sufficient. I think
>> at least we also need tests that test things like multi-statement
>> exec_simple-query() *with* explicit transactions and chaining.
> Added a few more tests for that.

I committed this patch with some cosmetic changes and documentation updates.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-09-08 21:01:20 pgsql: Fix RelationIdGetRelation calls that weren't bothering with erro
Previous Message fn ln 2019-09-07 17:31:58 Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2019-09-08 20:35:47 Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2019-09-08 19:32:08 Re: Bug in GiST paring heap comparator