Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example
Date: 2023-07-10 08:18:09
Message-ID: 97575663-BA68-44EC-9113-2969E25A56BB@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 14 Jun 2023, at 13:08, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:

>> Are you or Aleksander interested in helping improve this module? I'm happy
>> to help review and/or write patches.
>
> Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the problem in respect of naptime
> Julien is referring to. If you know what this problem is and how to
> fix it, go for it. I'll review and test the code then. I can write the
> part of the patch that fixes the part regarding dynamic workers if
> necessary.

Have you had a chance to look at these suggestions, and Juliens reply
downthread, in order to produce a new version of the patch?

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-10 08:27:53 Re: Eliminating SPI from RI triggers - take 2
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-10 08:12:36 Re: pg_usleep for multisecond delays