| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Paul A Vixie <vixie(at)vix(dot)com>, Vadim Kogan <vadim(at)xcf(dot)berkeley(dot)edu>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types. |
| Date: | 2001-10-16 14:32:36 |
| Message-ID: | 9718.1003242756@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Seems this will have to wait for 7.3.
> Why?
Because Paul's not yet responded to my gripes of (now) 10 days ago.
The patch as given reverts the I/O behavior of the inet datatypes
to what it originally was, rather than the compromise behavior that
was hammered out at great length before 7.1. (I'd give a link to
those discussions if fts.postgresql.org were working :-()
> and, to be a bit more riendly to those of us stuck on 56k lines, could you
> avoid re-sending, repeatedly, large patch files?
I agree on that one ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-16 14:34:48 | Re: IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types. |
| Previous Message | Paul A Vixie | 2001-10-16 14:20:35 | Re: IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types. |