Re: v13: Performance regression related to FORTIFY_SOURCE

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: v13: Performance regression related to FORTIFY_SOURCE
Date: 2020-06-06 01:30:17
Message-ID: 971466883e0a6a0aeea71821c0c909a549bf875c.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 21:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think what'd make more sense is to file this as a gcc bug ("why
> doesn't
> it remove the useless object size check?")

Filed:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95556

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2020-06-06 01:39:28 Re: v13: Performance regression related to FORTIFY_SOURCE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-06-06 01:01:56 Re: Atomic operations within spinlocks