Re: pg_dump -j against standbys

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump -j against standbys
Date: 2016-05-24 14:02:45
Message-ID: 970c2cdc-093a-7bf4-1b5c-8b2b447db62e@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/24/16 6:27 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> pg_dump: Synchronized snapshots are not supported on standby servers.

Would it be that much harder to support this use case, perhaps by having
the replica request the snapshot from the master on the client's behalf?
It certainly doesn't surprise me that people would want to parallel dump
from a replica...
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Shaplov 2016-05-24 14:06:54 [PROPOSAL][PROTOTYPE] Individual options for each index column: Opclass options
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-05-24 13:55:08 Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq