Re: autovacuum hung?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brian Cox <brian(dot)cox(at)ca(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: autovacuum hung?
Date: 2009-05-30 15:58:34
Message-ID: 9708.1243699114@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Brian Cox <brian(dot)cox(at)ca(dot)com> writes:
> autovacuum has been running on 2 tables for > 5 hours. There tables are
> not huge (see below). For the past ~1 hour, I've shut off all other
> activity on this database. The other table being vacuumed has more rows
> (1897810). Anyone have any ideas about why this is taking so long?

Are those processes actually doing anything, or just waiting? strace
or local equivalent would be the most conclusive check.

> cemdb=# select c.oid,c.relname,l.pid,l.mode,l.granted from pg_class c
> join pg_locks l on c.oid=l.relation order by l.pid;

This query isn't very helpful because it fails to show locks that are
not directly associated with tables.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2009-05-31 03:41:53 Re: Scalability in postgres
Previous Message Scott Carey 2009-05-30 00:48:45 Re: Scalability in postgres