| From: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Use SMgrRelation instead of SMgrRelationData * in pgaio_io_set_target_smgr() |
| Date: | 2026-03-13 07:29:31 |
| Message-ID: | 96EB95E4-9032-44A6-A397-153256AA5E4D@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mar 13, 2026, at 15:05, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, hackers
>
> While reading smgr.h, I noticed an inconsistent type usage in
> pgaio_io_set_target_smgr(). Currently the function is declared as:
>
> extern void pgaio_io_set_target_smgr(PgAioHandle *ioh,
> SMgrRelationData *smgr,
> ForkNumber forknum,
> BlockNumber blocknum,
> int nblocks,
>
> However, SMgrRelation is defined as "typedef SMgrRelationData * SMgrRelation;",
> and all other functions in the smgr subsystem use SMgrRelation as the parameter
> type.
>
> To keep the code consistent with the rest of the smgr API, this patch changes
> the parameter from SMgrRelationData * to SMgrRelation in both the definition
> and declaration.
>
> This is purely a style/consistency cleanup with no functional change.
>
> Thoughts? Is this change acceptable?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Japin Li
> ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
>
> <v1-0001-Use-SMgrRelation-instead-of-SMgrRelationData-in-p.patch>
pgaio_io_set_target_smgr doesn’t update smgr, so, instead of “SMgrRelation”, I think it’s better to change the type to "const SMgrRelationData *”.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2026-03-13 07:39:48 | Re: [PATCH] Support automatic sequence replication |
| Previous Message | Jonathan Gonzalez V. | 2026-03-13 07:18:57 | Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?) |