Re: Replacement for Oracle's "ROWNUM" in Postgres

From: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)domeus(dot)de>
To: "'pgsql-general'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replacement for Oracle's "ROWNUM" in Postgres
Date: 2002-12-20 09:11:50
Message-ID: 96D568DD7FAAAD428581F8B3BFD9B0F604DE98@goldmine.ecircle.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks guys for the answer !
The sequence solution works perfect for me.
Using OIDs is not the best solution, because I expect a sequence running
from 1 to the nr. of updated rows.
BTW, the 1..n sequence should have rang a bell...

Thanks again,
Csaba.

-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]Im Auftrag von Shridhar
Daithankar
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Dezember 2002 08:32
An: 'pgsql-general'
Betreff: Re: [GENERAL] Replacement for Oracle's "ROWNUM" in Postgres

On 19 Dec 2002 at 11:30, Bill Gribble wrote:

> On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 10:58, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> > This query is setting a date into a column for all the rows, starting
with a
> > fixed date with 10 minutes intervals.
> >
> > UPDATE some_table
> > SET some_date_column = 'some_literal_date' + (ROWNUM / 144.0);
> One way:
>
> CREATE SEQUENCE dateseq;
>
> UPDATE some_table
> SET some_date_column = 'some_literal_date' +
> (nextval('dateseq') / 144.0)
>
> DROP SEQUENCE dateseq;

Or use OID..

Bye
Shridhar

--
On-line, adj.: The idea that a human being should always be accessible to a

computer.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Lamb 2002-12-20 10:18:42 Re: IN or EXISTS?? faster one
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-12-20 07:31:58 Re: Replacement for Oracle's "ROWNUM" in Postgres