| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul |
| Date: | 2013-01-23 11:36:16 |
| Message-ID: | 968DCADD-E20B-488F-953A-FF88A490E744@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013/01/23, at 18:12, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 23 January 2013 04:49, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> - recovery.conf is removed (no backward compatibility in this version of the
>> patch)
>
> If you want to pursue that, you know where it leads. No, rebasing a
> rejected patch doesn't help, its just relighting a fire that shouldn't
> ever have been lit.
>
> Pushing to do that out of order is just going to drain essential time
> out of this CF from all of us.
No problem to support both. The only problem I see is if the same parameter is defined in recovery.conf and postgresql.conf, is the priority given to recovery.conf?
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com
(Sent from my mobile phone)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2013-01-23 12:05:52 | Re: Review : Add hooks for pre- and post-processor executables for COPY and \copy |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-01-23 11:03:53 | Re: [PATCH] unified frontend support for pg_malloc et al and palloc/pfree mulation (was xlogreader-v4) |