Re: WAL & SHM principles

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martin Devera <devik(at)cdi(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL & SHM principles
Date: 2001-03-07 16:21:37
Message-ID: 9678.983982097@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The only problem is that we would no longer have control over which
> pages made it to disk. The OS would perhaps write pages as we modified
> them. Not sure how important that is.

Unfortunately, this alone is a *fatal* objection. See nearby
discussions about WAL behavior: we must be able to control the relative
timing of WAL write/flush and data page writes.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-07 16:22:58 Re: WAL & SHM principles
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-07 16:09:25 Re: Proposed WAL changes