Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc> writes:
>> So that leaves us with needing
>> to find a better name for this new one. Any ideas?
> I'm thinking of something wide like
> opersel, operjoinsel, DEFAULT_OPER_SEL
> or maybe even
> genericsel, genericjoinsel, DEFAULT_GENERIC_SEL
Seems a little *too* generic :-(
I was wondering about DEFAULT_MATCHING_SEL. The difference in purpose
from DEFAULT_MATCH_SEL wouldn't be too obvious, but then it probably
wouldn't be anyway.
regards, tom lane