Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren
Date: 2010-12-20 15:28:30
Message-ID: 9635.1292858910@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> ... We have an open problem report on autovacuum failing to run after
> some time, and we haven't been able to get a backtrace or strace because
> of this issue ...

I wonder whether that's the already-fixed problem with autovacuum cost
limit going to zero in long-lived workers.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-20 15:48:21 Re: [GENERAL] queriing the version of libpq
Previous Message Aidan Van Dyk 2010-12-20 14:39:49 Re: Timeout for asynchronous replication Re: Timeout and wait-forever in sync rep