| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kirill Bychik <kirill(dot)bychik(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL usage calculation patch |
| Date: | 2020-04-17 13:15:22 |
| Message-ID: | 96013912-6742-be14-dca4-6e8394cc0541@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-04-14 05:57, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Peter E, others, any suggestions on how to move forward? I think here
> we should follow the rule "follow the style of nearby code" which in
> this case would be to have one space after each field as we would like
> it to be closer to the "Buffers" format. It would be good if we have
> a unified format among all Explain stuff but we might not want to
> change the existing things and even if we want to do that it might be
> a broader/bigger change and we should do that as a PG14 change. What
> do you think?
If looks like shortening to fpw= and using one space is the easiest way
to solve this issue.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-17 13:22:16 | Re: Support for DATETIMEOFFSET |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2020-04-17 13:09:07 | Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze) |