Re: [GENERAL] pgstattuple triggered checkpoint failure and database outage?

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I can't remember having seen bugs of this type before.

> If we had had this defense in place, it would have been obvious that
> reindex and cluster were buggy. The code to skip temp tables was not
> there from the beginning.

I thought my memory was probably failing me (excuse: no caffeine yet).

> (We already have rel->rd_istemp, but it's not what we need here.)

Yeah. I was considering converting that into a three-state flag, but
it might be simpler to remove it altogether and look to the new pg_class
field; only after we've gone down the path into localbuf.c would we
check relnamespace == our temp namespace before permitting a read or write.

Barring objections, I'll go make that happen. (And fix the contrib bugs
too, but not till after ... I'll need a test case ;-))

regards, tom lane