Re: [HACKERS] TODO doc items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-documentation <docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO doc items
Date: 2000-04-13 07:07:00
Message-ID: 9591.955609620@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Here are the open doc items. Should we consider ecpg.sgml as up-to-date
> as it needs to be for 7.0?

Michael Meskes said he thought the ecpg page was out of date ... but
AFAICS it's his responsibility to update it. If he doesn't get it
done, is there anyone else qualified to do it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2000-04-13 07:33:46 Re: [HACKERS] TODO doc items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-04-13 05:55:07 Re: the Chinese version docs