Re: Ability to listen on two unix sockets

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Honza Horak <hhorak(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ability to listen on two unix sockets
Date: 2012-06-07 15:55:11
Message-ID: 9556.1339084511@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Honza Horak <hhorak(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
> On 06/06/2012 04:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I wonder if the whole issue doesn't require libpq to also try multiple
>> hardcoded socket locations.

> I guess so.

I don't really want to go there. Some use cases have been shown in
this thread for having a server listen in multiple places, but that does
not translate to saying that clients need to support automatically
looking in multiple places. I think that mainly introduces questions we
could do without, like which server did you actually end up contacting.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-06-07 15:56:28 Re: XLog changes for 9.3
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-06-07 15:51:07 Re: XLog changes for 9.3