Re: max_wal_senders must die

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date: 2010-11-13 04:27:53
Message-ID: 9556.1289622473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Right. I propose that we set max_wal_senders to unlimited when
> wal_level = hot_standby.

It's a memory allocation parameter ... you can't just set it to
"unlimited", at least not without a nontrivial amount of work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2010-11-13 13:28:35 Re: wCTE behaviour
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-13 04:25:21 Re: pgsql: Improved parallel make support