Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date: 2016-04-27 21:47:14
Message-ID: 954f27d9-0532-8ab2-c94d-d981a7ad9967@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/27/16 5:08 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:

> So, in case it needs to be
> said, I'll say it: You've chosen a very ambitious set of projects to
> work on, by any standard. I think it's a good thing that you've been
> ambitious, and I don't suggest changing that, since I think that you
> have commensurate skill. But, in order to be successful in these
> projects, patience and resolve are very important.

+1.

This is very exciting work and I look forward to seeing it continue.
The patch was perhaps not a good fit for the last CF of 9.6 but that
doesn't mean it can't have a bright future.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2016-04-27 21:54:55 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Modify the isolation tester so that multiple sessions can wait.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-04-27 21:41:35 Re: