Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?
Date: 2021-03-25 13:56:55
Message-ID: 9546015d-4758-dfd8-04cb-d85c56ae4dc9@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/22/21 6:46 PM, Finnerty, Jim wrote:
> First 3 patches derived from the original 64-bit xid patch set by Alexander Korotkov

The patches no longer apply
(http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2960.log), so marked Waiting on Author.

I also removed the PG14 target since this is a fresh patch set after a
long hiatus with no new review.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2021-03-25 14:21:29 Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Previous Message John Naylor 2021-03-25 13:55:57 Re: Tying an object's ownership to datdba