Re: Unbounded %s in sscanf

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unbounded %s in sscanf
Date: 2021-10-15 14:07:21
Message-ID: 953868.1634306841@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> I propose to apply the attached all the way down (with the basebackup hunk from
> 11), or down to 10 if we want to be conservative with the final 9.6 re ancient
> bugs that haven't seen complaints.

LGTM. No objection to applying this in 9.6.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-10-15 14:46:03 Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-10-15 13:46:18 Re: installcheck fails when compute_query_id=on or pg_stat_statsement is loaded