Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, petermittere(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary
Date: 2025-07-15 20:38:13
Message-ID: 953177.1752611893@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> This thread doesn't look like we're going to find a wording that will
> make everyone happy, but I believe that this patch is a clear improvement.

Pushed with the "command message" wording. Thanks for the discussion!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2025-07-15 23:12:22 Re: Clarify VACUUM FULL exclusion in total_vacuum_time docs
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2025-07-15 16:27:51 Re: Clarify VACUUM FULL exclusion in total_vacuum_time docs