| From: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
| Date: | 2018-01-31 00:48:00 |
| Message-ID: | 9523ad05-525c-598e-ad2d-061b5a94062c@proxel.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/26/2018 03:28 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I'm a big fan of this patch but it doesn't appear to have made any
> progress in quite a while. Is there any chance we can get an updated
> patch and perhaps get another review before the end of this CF...?
Sorry, as you may have guessed I do not have the time right now to get
this updated during this commitfest.
> Refactoring this to have an internal representation between
> ProcessUtility() and DefineIndex doesn't sound too terrible and if it
> means the ability to reuse that, seems like it'd be awful nice to do
> so..
I too like the concept, but have not had the time to look into it.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-01-31 00:50:50 | Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-01-31 00:44:02 | Re: FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables |